PUGAD wants to thank and wishes also a happy New Year to all our partners and friends in the international community and looks forward to all the challenges in 2012 when it comes to fight poverty and especially again and again to remind the rich countries upon their promises regarding development aid, the 2015 Millenium Goals, funding the necassary climate adaptation so the many nice words are turned into manifest actions.
Some of the most positve events in 2011 was the Arab Spring where a new generation of youngsters went to the streets and demanded a genuine democracy and respect for human rights with the slogan “Fight for dignity or die trying” - no doubt that this tendencies will continue and we already see the initial steps in Russia where the middle class (IT users ) has been gathering for several times and demanding a new and fair election. Occupy Wall Street was also a very welcome initiative because it catalyst that the market ( banking and financial institutions ) has to much much control over the economy whether it is business, currency rates and the many short sighted speculative ways of getting a quick profit i.e. derivative trading, speculating in food prices’ de-and increase. Here we need determined politcians who can agree and implement the necessary regulation and prohibite short sighted speculation among other things by approving a financial transactions tax ( Tobin ) of app. 0,1 percent per trading a value paper - here by we will see a dramatic decline in the speculative trade and more real investments which also will enable us with a more stable economy which we need in fighting poverty - only when we have a stable economy and investr in growth and jobs we will have the focus upon developing the societies and economies in the developing world.
The PUGAD and Tambuyog Project
The basis for MFRL can be found in the National Fisheries Code of 1998. However, the specific national law pertaining to MFRL and the guidelines for its implementation was issued only in 2004 in the form of an executive order by the Philippine president. This is Executive Order 305 (EO 305) which is entitled “Devolving to Municipal and City Governments the Registration of Fishing Vessels Three (3) Gross Tonnage and below.”
Even with the issuance of EO 305, municipal governments would not be able to implement MFRL within their jurisdictions without a local enabling ordinance based on EO 305. Because local governments were given autonomy under the Local Government Code of 1991, almost every national law has to be supplemented by a local ordinance for it to be applicable. Since EO 305 came out in 2004, several municipalities have enacted their own local ordinances based on it. However, there is no data yet on the number of municipalities that have already enacted these local ordinances, and whether or not they constitute the majority of the total 915 coastal municipalities (and cities) in the country. As a result, there is no way of knowing the extent of implementation of the MFRL on a nationwide scale.
Issues in MFRL implementation
Notwithstanding the lack of data, reports gathered by the Bureau of Fisheries & Aquatic Resources (BFAR) on the implementation of MFRL in several municipalities reveal the disturbing fact that municipal governments regard licensing basically as a revenue-generating measure rather than a means to regulate fishing effort and prevent overfishing.
This treatment of MFRL as primarily a revenue-generating measure and the neglect of resource and ecological assessments will have serious consequences on the already precarious status of the municipal fishery resources. As already mentioned, some affected fishers simply did not bother to register and apply for a license in defiance of EO 305 and its local ordinance. Of course, they will continue fishing even without a license since it is their only means of livelihood. On the other hand, fishers who paid the fees tried to “make up” for the amount “lost” by increasing their fishing effort subsequently. Therefore, the MFRL in its current form fails as a regulatory measure; it even tends to worsen overfishing in municipal waters instead of curbing it.
What needs to be done
There is therefore a need to study the current MFRL implementation, assess its limitations and its impacts on municipal fishers and on the municipal fisheries resources, and analyze the factors or reasons behind the limitations and the impacts. Likewise, there is a need to study relevant foreign experiences to draw lessons on how other countries tackled similar problems and designed an appropriate version of small-scale fisheries registration and licensing in their own context. These studies are important in order to develop policy recommendations for a more appropriate and more effective MFRL framework, which means, among other things, taking into account the resource rent (surplus) of the municipal fishing ground and integrating the distinct role of women as fisher-gleaners. These policy recommendations should be based on studies of the limitations of the existing MFRL approach and implementation and of relevant foreign experiences in small-scale fisheries registration and licensing.
In July Month we have a huge multistake holder conference in Manila where we will discuss the results from all the pilot sites and hopefully we can introduce a new management model where the fisheries is sustainable and still able to support the fishers with livelyhood.
Besides that PUGAD is busy with the conference the March 23rd. at the Danish Parliament regarding the European Union’s revised Fisheries Code where our main point is to focus upon the privatization of a public ressource: the Oceans which you can trade as Individual Transfetable Quotas. This model would be very dangerous in the developing countries because it will take away livelyhood from millions of small scale fisherfolks.
PUGAD wish you all a Happy new New Year and we need you in the fight for a more fair world.
Kind regards Einer Lyduch
chairman of PUGAD




